Sri
Ujjal Bhuyan, Hon’ble Justice, Gauhati High Court inaugurated the Moot Court in Royal
School of Law & Administration on 27 May 2017 at Royal Global University.
It was followed by a Seminar on ‘Legal Education and Challenges Faced in
Quality Litigation’. Eminent personalities like Retd.Justice Sri.B.D.Agarwal,
Dr.O.K.Medhi, Ex-VC, Gauhati University, Mr. J.S Patil, VC, National Law University,
Guwahati, Dr.Bhaskarjyoti Kr Hazarika, HOD, Department of Law, Tezpur
University, Dr.Matiur Rahman, Associate Professor, Gauhati University Law
College, Mr.Debajit Das, Advocate, Gauhati High Court, Ms.Rakhee Choudhury,
Advocate, Gauhati High Court and other members of the law fraternity.
The
topic of the seminar being on Legal Education and challenges faced in quality
litigation, Prof.(Dr.) S.P.Singh,Vice-Chancellor,
RGU, stressed on litigation, remuneration, scope of abroad jobs, corporate
jobs, quality students for litigation, long gestation period and the advantages
of good litigation lawyers.
Ms. Rakhi Chowdhury, Advocate, Gauhati
High Court spoke on How
the different fields of education are clubbed with legal education in context
of various social, economic, political and scientific aspects. Advantages of
moot court and several new facets of legal education, opportunities of law has
increased over the years, remuneration provided to the litigation students are
meager and in turn de-motivates the students to pursue the practical court
sessions further. The long waiting hours adds to the disinterest of the
students, theoretical part different from the practical part and students
should be taught how the legal practice works, the other nuances like the cause
list, settle a bag, filing, books etc.
Dr. Matiur Rehman, Associate
Professor, Gauhati University Law College, Focused and
talked on how the growth of law schools and law universities have taken the
legal education onto a different level and how it has grown manifold. He also
spoke on the demand of legal education in the field of humanities, commerce,
science & technology. Legal education & quality litigation are related to
each other and is the need of the hour. Clinical legal education is a modern
way of legal education and should be given top priority and should be included
in the curriculum. There has been a rapid change in the outlook of the legal
education and he further cited the example of Taj Mahal as the best way to
understand quality litigation
Mr. Debojit Kumar Das, Advocate,
Gauhati High Court spoke on Jurisprudence as the subject
matter of discussion in the world law scenario, quality of legal education in the
law colleges were dismal as compared to today and adhocism was a rule,
mediocrity the scenario. He talked on the Advocate Act which started
functioning in the year 1960, system of improving the quality of law colleges
should be taken care of. Because of adhocism of the bar council, the quality of
legal education has suffered. He also spoke about the concept of
apprenticeship, stipend system that should be looked after by the bar council.
Mr. Bhaskar Chakraborty, HOD,
Department of Law, Tezpur University, spoke on how to improve
legal education. He added that there should be career academic teachers. He
spoke on PSDA - Professional skill development activities and also mentioned
that it should be introduced in the curriculum of all the law courses to make
the students ready to face the practical aspect of law and improve the learning
methods. Professional aspect should be given prominence to improve the quality
of students. Revision of course structure should be taken up. Introduction of
workshops, seminars both at regional & national levels should be conducted
on a regular basis. A law course should be of minimum 5 years. The two
regulatory bodies – UGC & The Bar Council should come forward with some
better ideas to improve legal education and thus make better lawyers in the
country.
Mr. J.S Patil, VC, National Law University talked
about colonization, plurality of culture, general panorama of high education and that BAR council is money centric. Justice is administered and further questioned about the panorama
of litigation in our country. He
spoke about heuristics and the law.
Mr. Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Gauhati High
Court , talked about docket explosion – problems and arrears of
delay in case settlements. He further added that we should tune & sensitize
ourselves to the constitution and unless the system is de-clogged, there cannot
be a good quality of litigation. A
practical study/approach will be able to hone the skills of the students and a
facility like the moot court will improve the quality of mooting of the
students. He said that the arrears
and pendency of the cases should be taken care of and stated that the relation between a senior and junior cannot be
quantified/measured in terms of money. He
spoke on about national judicial
data grid, computerization of the courts, econnectivity, uploading of all the
cases of the day with a uniform case number which will travel all throughout
the litigation journey of the litigant, digitization record system and about lok adalats, plea bargaining, free press and free judiciary.
Questions
were asked from the august audience to which the panelists answered moderated
by Ms.Rakhee Choudhury.